In
search of a business use for Twitter
by
Alan Zisman (c) 2009 First published in
Business
in Vancouver May 5-11, 2009; issue 1019
High Tech Office column
I’m supposed to be ahead
of the crowd when it comes to tech trends. But I’ve been ignoring
Twitter. The much-hyped “micro-blogging” service seemed a bit too goofy
to me.
Twitter is another free Internet service – like, say,
Facebook (last year’s Web 2.0 darling). You sign up and add people you
know who are also using the service. In Twitter-speak, you’re
“following” them. They, in turn, can choose to follow you – or not.
You
see the “tweets” – short text messages, no more than 140 characters,
posted by the people you follow in a list on your screen – in your
browser, in a dedicated Twitter utility (there are lots to choose from
for Windows, Mac, Linux, et al) or on a mobile device. (Note: Canadians
are mobile-device-Twitter crippled; only Bell subscribers have full
on-phone access.)
Though the space to type is labelled “What are
you doing?” you probably shouldn’t take that literally. You can respond
to a tweet, either publicly or privately, but it’s not really an
effective way to carry out a back-and-forth conversation.
Recently,
I succumbed and signed on. The service offered to scan my Gmail contact
list looking for e-mail addresses belonging to other Twitter users (and
promising to ignore the rest). I could opt to follow them. Depending on
how they’d set their preferences, they might receive an e-mail
notification for each new follower giving them the chance to
reciprocate and follow me. Within a few moments, I was following a
couple of dozen people I knew. Half a dozen or so were also following
me, and a list of recent tweets appeared on my screen.
(You can
bet that mega-popular Twitter users – Ashton Kutcher recently became
the first with over a million followers and Oprah Winfrey recently
signed on and is coming on strong – won’t get e-mail notification if
you opt to follow them, and are unlikely to follow your tweets or mine.)
So
what do the tweets on my screen say? Ontario tech guru Jim Carroll (139
followers) points us to a “hilarious Canadian government video.” PC
Magazine editor Lance Ulanoff (6,700 followers) lets us know that New
York City has “amazing” weather today and tells what he’d watched on
the Fox movie channel. Vancouver Sun reporter Gillian Shaw (2,000
followers) complains that the TV on the ferry wasn’t showing the
Canucks game. New York Times tech columnist David Pogue (175,000
followers) shared: “If electricity comes from electrons, does that mean
that morality comes from morons?”
I tweeted my now 14 followers
that I was looking for ideas for the column I needed to write this
weekend. So far, no one has replied. You can peek at Twitter superstar
Ashton Kutcher’s page at:
http://twitter.com/aplusk – his Twitter-life
doesn’t seem significantly more engaging than mine.
You
can search Twitter for people or check out the service’s Suggested
Users list, a collection of B-list celebrities like Weird Al Yankovic,
Bob Vila and Demi Moore (Mrs. Ashton Kutcher) and politicians like Al
Gore, John McCain, Newt Gingrich and Jerry Brown. Many of the PR people
in my contact list are on Twitter. Checking a few of their pages
suggests to me that they’re not using it any more effectively as a
business tool than anyone else.
David Pogue reported a Twitter
experiment. He tweeted a request for a cure for hiccups; within
moments, he had over 20 replies, ranging from the amusing to the usable
– at least if he had the hiccups.
Of course, Pogue has thousands
of followers. So far, I still haven’t had any suggestions for what to
write this weekend. So I remain a Twitter-agnostic. But wait – I just
got notification of another follower – a stranger to me! Maybe it will
become useful to me after all.
Or maybe it’s too late – search
YouTube (2007’s most-hyped web service) for “Flutter” – a spoof video
promoting the next great web service, replacing “micro-blogging” with
“nano-blogging.”
Any Twitter business-usefulness success stories out there? Let me know.
•